1 ### for requests on port 80
2 NameVirtualHost *:80
3 <VirtualHost *:80>
4 ### set the servername
5 ServerName example.com
6 ### alias the location of applications (for static files)
7 Alias / /home/web2py/applications/
8 ### setup WSGI
9 WSGIScriptAlias / /home/web2py/wsgihandler.py
10 WSGIDaemonProcess web2py user=www-data group=www-data \
11 home=/home/web2py/ \
12 processes=10 maximum-requests=500
13 ### admin requires SSL
14 <Location "/admin">
17 ### appadmin requires SSL
18 <LocationMatch "ˆ(/[\w_]*/appadmin/.*)">
21 ### static files do not need WSGI
22 <LocationMatch "ˆ(/[\w_]*/static/.*)">
23 Order Allow,Deny
24 Allow from all
26 ### everything else goes over WSGI
27 <Location "/">
28 Order deny,allow
29 Allow from all
30 WSGIProcessGroup web2py
32 LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b" common
33 CustomLog /var/log/apache2/access.log common
35 ### for requests via SSL (port 443) enable SSL
36 NameVirtualHost *:443
37 <VirtualHost *:443>
38 ServerName example.com
39 Alias / /home/web2py/applications/
40 WSGIScriptAlias / /home/web2py/wsgihandler.py
41 WSGIDaemonProcess web2py user=www-data group=www-data \
42 home=/home/web2py/ \
43 processes=10 maximum-requests=500
44 SSLEngine On
45 SSLCertificateFile /etc/apache2/ssl/server.crt
46 SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/apache2/ssl/server.key
47 <LocationMatch "ˆ(/[\w_]*/static/.*)">
48 Order Allow,Deny
49 Allow from all
51 <Location "/">
52 Order deny,allow
53 Allow from all
54 WSGIProcessGroup web2py
56 LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b" common
57 CustomLog /var/log/apache2/access.log common
As already stated in the last post, this has all the same problems as for the HTTP only configuration. Because a separate VirtualHost is used for HTTP and HTTPS, the problems are actually duplicated and occur in each VirtualHost. I will not cover all that again, so ensure you read the last post.
On top of those problems, the HTTPS configuration contains an additional mistake, this time in how mod_wsgi is used.
The mistake here is having a second WSGIDaemonProcess directive at line 41. Doing this will fail because the same daemon process group name of 'web2py' was used as the first argument to the directive, as was used in the WSGIDaemonProcess directive at line 10. The mod_wsgi module will reject this, as the names for daemon process groups must be unique no matter what context they are placed in.
The first thought might be just to change the name as well as the reference to it in the WSGIProcessGroup directive at line 54. Although this will work, it does mean you then have a second daemon process group containing another 10 processes just for handling the HTTPS requests. As I already explained, the number of processes/threads was excessive and doing that would just make the problem twice as bad.
What one really wants is for both HTTP and HTTPS requests to use the same daemon process group. There are two ways one could achieve this.
The first is to delete the WSGIDaemonProcess directive at line 41 and move the WSGIDaemonProcess directive at line 10 outside of both VirtualHost definitions. In other words, it is placed at global scope within the Apache configuration. By doing this, WSGI applications within any VirtualHost, regardless of ServerName, could be delegated to that daemon process group.
If this your own system and you aren't hosting sites for other users, doing it this way is likely acceptable. If you want a slightly more secure configuration, you should still delete the WSGIDaemonProcess directive at line 41, but leave that at line 10 in place.
What is being relied upon in that case is that mod_wsgi will allow you to reference using the WSGIProcessGroup directive, a daemon process group specified in the context of another VirtualHost, so long as the ServerName for the VirtualHost is the same.
This is a bit safer, because having the WSGIDaemonProcess directive within the VirtualHost means you can't accidentally delegate a WSGI application to it from a VirtualHost for a different ServerName set up for a different user.
Which ever of the two methods is used, there is another subtlety at play in what is happening that is important to point out. This is that by default mod_wsgi will separate WSGI applications such that they run in distinct sub interpreters of the process they run in. The name of the sub interpreter is derived from ServerName, the port for the VirtualHost and the mount point of the application.
Normally this rule for deriving the name of the sub interpreter would actually mean that since HTTP and HTTPS connections are received on different ports, that there would still be two instances of the WSGI application in each process and thus twice as much memory used. Because though ports 80 and 443 are generally paired together for a site, mod_wsgi makes an exception in this case and will actually assign requests for the WSGI application through either port to run in the same sub interpreter. Thus, only one instance of the application in each process.
If for some reason this was a big issue, then you could go back to using two distinctly named daemon process groups. Alternatively, you could use the WSGIApplicationGroup directive to control the name of the sub interpreter each is assigned to. This would see them run together in the same process, but in different sub interpreters with names you designate.
So, that is it for the problems with the configuration that is doing the rounds for web2py and mod_wsgi. In summary, it will not work. Even if you drop the Alias directive so the web2py application receives requests, the use of Location and LocationMatch to control access to URLs is dangerous. On top of that, for the combined HTTP/HTTPS configuration, Apache wouldn't have even started up as mod_wsgi would have complained about the daemon process group names not being unique.
I'll give details of a working configuration for running web2py on top of mod_wsgi later when I get some more time.