tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2363643920942057324.post971657769665265196..comments2010-11-24T09:13:06.052+11:00Comments on Graham Dumpleton: Parallel Python discussion and mod_wsgi.Graham Dumpletonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13609779138164842374noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2363643920942057324.post-48751309931649624232007-09-18T06:47:00.000+10:002007-09-18T06:47:00.000+10:00It can use both, see:<br><br> http://code.google....It can use both, see:<BR/><BR/> http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/ProcessesAndThreadingGraham Dumpletonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13609779138164842374noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2363643920942057324.post-16049356714661828392007-09-18T05:45:00.000+10:002007-09-18T05:45:00.000+10:00I am fairly ignorant of the inner workings of apac...I am fairly ignorant of the inner workings of apache, but I find it interesting that it uses a process rather than thread approach. And that processes seem to work pretty well.Brucehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03809714935758594746noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2363643920942057324.post-86439465409729663212007-09-13T05:07:00.000+10:002007-09-13T05:07:00.000+10:00This is cool (as long as you're deploying using Ap...This is cool (as long as you're deploying using Apache). But it seems the author of the "open letter" wasn't aware of this or rejected the idea. Yo might want to leave a comment there pointing to this blog entry.Guido van Rossumhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12821714508588242516noreply@blogger.com