tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2363643920942057324.post850786034399276221..comments2023-08-09T23:00:54.857+10:00Comments on Graham Dumpleton: The mod_python project soon to be officially dead.Graham Dumpletonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13609779138164842374noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2363643920942057324.post-87320410379530066332010-06-21T10:56:13.492+10:002010-06-21T10:56:13.492+10:00Appreciate your clarification,
I will try it and ...Appreciate your clarification, <br />I will try it and let you know how it went.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08250412884223637459noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2363643920942057324.post-32811753194747390492010-06-20T11:32:42.947+10:002010-06-20T11:32:42.947+10:00Beaker can use a separate database that holds sess...Beaker can use a separate database that holds session information, it is not in memory only. If it were only in memory, then even a single Apache instance wouldn't work as most modes of Apache are multi process. If something supports multi process model, then shouldn't be any reason why the multiple processes cant be on different systems. The only caveat is that must be a database that Graham Dumpletonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13609779138164842374noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2363643920942057324.post-67533107563346581732010-06-20T11:23:23.036+10:002010-06-20T11:23:23.036+10:00I will surly look into the details of Beaker, on t...I will surly look into the details of Beaker, on the face of it, it looks like this is not the soln I am looking for, I am looking to cluster multiple nodes of django, and I don’t want to loose session while moving from one node to other, my customer must not know that the node has died. Is there a possibility of doing it with the existing stack?Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08250412884223637459noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2363643920942057324.post-76010522630599628322010-06-20T10:55:58.423+10:002010-06-20T10:55:58.423+10:00@Ruchir. Have you looked at Beaker? That provides ...@Ruchir. Have you looked at Beaker? That provides session mechanisms for systems using WSGI interface.Graham Dumpletonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13609779138164842374noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2363643920942057324.post-33480159009719857412010-06-20T09:19:55.353+10:002010-06-20T09:19:55.353+10:00Session based clustering using mod_wsgi.
Friends:...Session based clustering using mod_wsgi.<br /><br />Friends: wanted to know how can we do session based clustering to scale the Python/mod-wsgi env, If I don’t want to use Apache clustering, load balancing or hardware based load balancing, is there any soln avilable, any help will be highly appreciate.<br /><br />If there is just nothing avilable can we are a group try to do it? I can contribute Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08250412884223637459noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2363643920942057324.post-7356937302350896632010-06-13T02:11:22.108+10:002010-06-13T02:11:22.108+10:00Thanks for the clear and thoughtful post outlining...Thanks for the clear and thoughtful post outlining the directions that python / apache development has taken.patsplathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04091666538475273376noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2363643920942057324.post-68689350663616697222010-05-30T16:54:25.947+10:002010-05-30T16:54:25.947+10:00mod_wsgi-- Is a better and more reliable option.
...mod_wsgi-- Is a better and more reliable option. <br /><br />In particular with Python-3.X on the horizon with 64 bit support its much easier to configure mod_wsgi VS mod_python.<br /><br />I this we must move on to support mod_wsgi and help this community grow.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08250412884223637459noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2363643920942057324.post-65388235228470686672010-05-28T13:42:28.463+10:002010-05-28T13:42:28.463+10:00I'm sad to see it go - I was a participant man...I'm sad to see it go - I was a participant many moons ago and recall meeting Grisha at PyCon in DC; but happily it was retired because there are better alternatives.Jack Diederichhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01875505174692466327noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2363643920942057324.post-90047999707439764672010-05-28T04:05:06.336+10:002010-05-28T04:05:06.336+10:00Oh, shouldn't your announcement also be sent t...Oh, shouldn't your announcement also be sent to the mod_python mailing list? I didn't see it (or it hasn't shown up yet). ThanksDeron Merandahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18332381064910373026noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2363643920942057324.post-36594628079004779272010-05-28T04:02:19.096+10:002010-05-28T04:02:19.096+10:00Graham, thanks for the informative post.
I know I...Graham, thanks for the informative post.<br /><br />I know I've discussed before; but I'm one (of the few?) who currently use and depend on many of the advanced Apache handler features that mod_python provides. I'm still very interested in whether such things might make it into mod_wsgi or some add-on; and also if there's anything I could possibly help with to make that work Deron Merandahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18332381064910373026noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2363643920942057324.post-16933533295995635772010-05-28T03:41:57.330+10:002010-05-28T03:41:57.330+10:00Thanks for providing such a complete update on a h...Thanks for providing such a complete update on a historically very important Python effort, Graham! Many of us first used Python with the web through experiments with mod_python, and I am glad that the Apache Foundation provides a process for a project retiring, instead of the (unfortunately) more usual drop into oblivion that open source projects experience at the end of their lives.<br /><br /Brandon Rhodeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04530745611634767785noreply@blogger.com